Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ¿¡¼­ µÎ°³¾È¸é ÇüÅÂ¿Í Áö¹®ÀÇ À¯Àü¼ºÇ⠺м®

Analysis of the hereditary factor in craniofacial morphology and fingerprints in Class ¥² malocclusion

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2004³â 34±Ç 4È£ p.279 ~ 287
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿ÀÅÂ°æ ¹éÇü¼±

Abstract

¼ºÀå±â ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ È¯ÀÚÀÇ Ä¡·á½Ã ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾Ç¾È¸é ¼ºÀåÀº Ä¡·á¼ºÆÐÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼ÒÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÀÛÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ¾È¸é¼ºÀåÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ¾Æµ¿¿¡¼­ ¼ºÀåÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýµé ÁßÀÇ Çϳª·Î µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃø»çÁø ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ À¯ÀüÀû ¿ä¼ÒÀÇ °ü·Ã¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ 50°¡Á·¿¡¼­ ºÎ¸ðÀڽİ£ÀÇ ¾Ç¾È¸é ÇüÅÂÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Àڽİú ºÎ¸ð°£ÀÇ Áö¹®ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû ¿¬°ü¼ºÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ°í ºÎ¸ðÀڽİ£ÀÇ ¾Ç¾È¸é ÇüÅÂ¿Í Áö¹®ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû ¿¬°ü¼º°úÀÇ À¯ÀüÀû »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ºÎ¸ðÀڽİ£ÀÇ ¾Ç¾È¸é ÇüÅ¿¡¼­ Ä¡¼º°ü°èº¸´Ù´Â ¾Ç°ñ°ü°è¿¡¼­ ´õ À¯Àü¼ºÇâÀÌ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ¾Æ¹öÁö°¡ ¾î¸Ó´Ï¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀÚ½ÄÀÇ ¾Ç°ñ°ü°è¿¡ ´õ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
2. ÀÚ½ÄÀÇ Áö¹® ÇüÅ´ ¾Æ¹öÁöº¸´Ù´Â ¾î¸Ó´Ï¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ´õ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
3. ºÎ¸ð¿Í Àڽİ£ÀÇ Áö¹®°ú ¾Ç¾È¸é ÇüÅ¿¡¼­ À¯ÀüÀû »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç(P£¼0.05-0.01), µþº¸´Ù´Â ¾Æµé¿¡°Ô¼­ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ´õ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

In growing patients with Class ¥² malocclusion, the various patterns of maxillofacial growth are a key element that affects the success or failure of treatment. Therefore it is important to correctly predict maxillofacial growth before initiating treatment. The purpose of this study was to find out the correlation between the maxillofacial morphology of parents and their Class ¥² children by analyzing lateral cephalograms and hereditary factors. Among Class ¥² preadolescent children, 50 families were obtained. To find out the specific hereditary factors involved, fingerprints were obtained and genetic correlation with the maxillofacial morphology was analyzed. The following conclusions were made.
1. A significant correlation (P£¼0.05-0.001) was found in many of the cephalometric measurements between the offspring and their parents. The correlation in the skeleton measurements was higher than in the denture measurements. The father-offspring correlation was higher than the mother-offspring correlation
2. A significant correlation (P£¼0.05-0.001) was found in fingerprint units between the offspring and their parents. The mother-offspring correlation was higher than the father-offspring correlation.
3. Between the maxillofacial morphology and fingerprint units, there was significant genetic correlation (P£¼0.05-0.01). Based on the analysis of genetic correlation, higher correlation was found in the parent-son pairing than the parent-daughter pairing.

Å°¿öµå

À¯Àü¼ºÇâ;¾Ç¾È¸é ÇüÅÂ;Áö¹®;À¯ÀüÀû »ó°ü°ü°è;Hereditary factor;Maxillofacial morphology;Fingerprint;Genetic correlation

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed